Part L SAP Changes: Thermals
Over the coming weeks we’ll be examining the upcoming changes to SAP and SBEM in more detail, which will hopefully give you a bit of a head start when these tougher regulations kick in come October 1st.
This week we’re going to tackle thermal bridging and thermal mass – but first we need to understand what these terms mean.
Thermal bridging occurs wherever there is a break, gap or join in the insulation of a building. So that can occur where a wall and a roof meet, at corners, around window sills and door frames and between joists. Some thermal bridges are taken into account when the U-Value is calculated (such as where timber frame cuts through the insulation), but the bits known as ‘non-repeating thermal bridges’ have to be measured differently.
Why do they have to be measured – SAP measures the heating demand of a house. The more heat that can escape from a house, the harder the heating system will need to work, so SAP includes ventilation rates (to measure purposeful air holes), U-Values (to measure thermal efficiency of the envelope) and thermal bridging values (to measure the thermal efficiency of junctions in the construction.
As assessors, we currently have default figures to use - if you build to Accredited Construction Details or a similarly approved scheme, we can use one default value. If you don’t build to a recognised quality mark, we use a worse default value. The ‘value’ in question in like a U-Value, but is measured in a linear way, not area. It is called a psi-value, the lower the better.
Under the new SAP which fires up in October, the thermal bridging will need to be measured, rather than a default figure assumed. So, providing you build to a recognised scheme, we can calculate the perimeters, corner lengths and junctions of your dwelling, and provide a far more accurate result for the SAP Calculation. A worst case default figure will still be available.
So what can you do to make this figure as favourable as possible. There’s a couple of things… you can design dwellings with fewer junctions… you don’t need to go down the route of lighthouse buildings (as they don’t have corners), but less complex shapes and designs will help. Another way of lowering your psi-value is to get hold of the psi-value for individual insulation materials (this can be near impossible to find, but we expect the industry will start publishing this information once they realize this could earn them a few extra sales.
Another area of SAP which is moving away from defaults into accurate measuring is the ‘Thermal Mass Parameter’ or ‘How well a building stores heat during the day and releases into the home at night’. When compared to masonry builds, timber houses heat up quickly but don’t store heat for as long, so you use less heat during the day, but potentially more at night.
Currently SAP does not allow you to work out your own Thermal Mass Calculation, but this too is being altered. From the test studies we have completed, timber frame houses will fair better from this change to the methodology if built with a standard specification… if you are building a house with extremely low U-Values and ventilation rates, the masonry construction will fair better.
I hope that hasn’t confused you too much – out of all the changes to SAP, this is the toughest one to explain, I’m glad we’ve got that out of the way!
If you’d like any more information on the changes to the Part L Building Regulations please give Energist a call on 08458 386 387 to see how we can help.
